Re: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Tolga Asveren wrote: (Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:18:44) > > Interconnect is not done at the core of the network. GTT is. No self > > respecting SS7 network operator would connect your SUA junk to their > > primary STPs any day soon. Lot's o' luck. > [TOLGA]I think you also agree that there is a need to organize networks > hierachicaly and for that reason we need relaying. That hierarchical > organization can depoend on different SS7 constructs depending on the needs > of the operator, e.g. GTT, and entities supporting relay can be deployed > anywhere in the network again depending on the needs. And so SUA permits any node to have the relay capability in the IP domain. > [TOLGA]I disagree with you. It allows hierarchical organization/easier > configuration of the network and also backhauling SS7 traffic over IP. If > you look to other IP based protocols, which are supposed to be used between > core network entities, you will see similar capabilities as well, e.g. > Diameter. Probably, I should quote one of your favorites: "If you don't want > it, do not use it" STPs act a link concentrators. When there are no links, there is no need for concentration. MTP relay in the IP domain is pointless. SG-SG is more important for a usable IPSP for M3UA. SUA is fine as it is. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/