Re: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tolga,

Tolga Asveren wrote:                                                 (Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:18:44)

> > Interconnect is not done at the core of the network.  GTT is.  No self
> > respecting SS7 network operator would connect your SUA junk to their
> > primary STPs any day soon.  Lot's o' luck.
> [TOLGA]I think you also agree that there is a need to organize networks
> hierachicaly and for that reason we need relaying. That hierarchical
> organization can depoend on different SS7 constructs depending on the needs
> of the operator, e.g. GTT, and entities supporting relay can be deployed
> anywhere in the network again depending on the needs.

And so SUA permits any node to have the relay capability in the IP domain.

> [TOLGA]I disagree with you. It allows hierarchical organization/easier
> configuration of the network and also backhauling SS7 traffic over IP. If
> you look to other IP based protocols, which are supposed to be used between
> core network entities, you will see similar capabilities as well, e.g.
> Diameter. Probably, I should quote one of your favorites: "If you don't want
> it, do not use it"

STPs act a link concentrators.  When there are no links, there is no need
for concentration.  MTP relay in the IP domain is pointless.

SG-SG is more important for a usable IPSP for M3UA.

SUA is fine as it is.

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.