RE: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field

Stanislav Ivanovich <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tolga,
   
  Are you saying that the AS/RC concept should apply in between SUA at appl1 place and SUA relay point in between appl1 and appl2?
   
  /stanislav
   
   

Tolga Asveren <[email protected]> wrote:
  
[..snip..]
> > [TOLGA]What about in IP domain? The goal with the protocols is
> to define a
> > sound architecture, which allows interoperability and does not
> allow room
> > for ambiguity. IMO allowing IPSP functionality to allow
> relaying is against
> > those principles. I also want to reemphasize that here we are
> speaking of
> > different roles played by SUA stack, i.e. we can have SUA-node which can
> > both relay and use IPSP communication. What we are discussing is, where
> > those different functionalites should reside.
>
> Functional placement is an implementation issue.
To clarify what I mean, consider the following figure (SUA stands for SUA
functionalities, it does not refer to any specific implementation, e.g. it
can be one or more than one stack instance)

+-------+
| App4 |
+-------+
| SUA + +-------+ +-------+
+--+----+ | App1 | | App2 |
| SGP/ASP +-------+ +-------+
+--procedures-----+ SUA +---IPSP-------+ SUA |
+--------+--+----+ procedures +-------+
| |
SGP/ASP |
+-------+ procedures SGP/ASP
| App5 | | procedures
+-------+ | |
| SUA +---+ | +-------+
+-------+ | | App3 |
+--+----+ +-------+
| SUA +---SGP/ASP----+ SUA |
+-------+ procedures +-------+

Let's suppose for App1/App2 communication, there is no need for GTT -nor for
any other type of relay-, so IPSP procedures are used.

For App1/App3 communication we need GTT, so messages are sent from App1 to
an entity which can perform GTT and relay. For that communication SGP/ASP
procedures are used.

Let's suppose the node hosting App1 performs certain GTT functions as well
and they are used for communication between App4/App5. In this case, again
SGP/ASP procedures will be used.

This, IMO allows a clean separation between interfaces used for different
purposes.



_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
  


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.