Re: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stanislav, Stanislav Ivanovich wrote: (Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:22:59) > > Tolga, > > > > I agree with you. > > > > I noticed that I made mistake in my qustion addressed to you, I > actually meant Appl1<->Appl3 as I correctly assumed. > > > > In addition I would say that any relay based on MTP (SPC) or SCCP (GT) > logic should always be covered with SGP<->SGP communication model > without having AS/RC concept used in between. In other words I see > SG-SG model good regardless is it for GT based or SPC based or > anything other... > > > > When I looked into your SGP-SGP draft I forgot to propose maybe change > of terminology -> maybe other SIGTRAN community memebers are confused > and think that in this way it is relay "on the network edges" or that > it assumes "gateway functionality". Actually in the essence it is > about new role of the exisitng SGP process whihc is to relay not only > between SS7 and IP but also IP to IP. This also implies new commun! > ication model between SGP-SGP since AS/RC concept is not to be used > there. SGs, by definition in the consensus model, have SS7 interfaces. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/