Re: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Go read RFC 2719 again. --brian Tolga Asveren wrote: (Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:57:38) > > SGs, by definition in the consensus model, have SS7 interfaces. > [TOLGA]I have a different opinion here. It is obvious that the initial/main > purpose was to interface conventional SS7 networks -hence the "gateway" in > the name-, but OTOH conceptually what SGP provides is just hosting > corresponding SCCP(MTP3 for M3UA) layer for the applications on ASPs. As far > as I can see it really doesn't matter whether TDM based links or IP > transport is used to transfer bits and bytes. > > You know that it has been agreed that the following, where SGP1 relays > between ASP1 and ASP2 is a valid configuration: > > +------+ +------+ > | ASP1 | | ASP2 | > +--+---+ +---+--+ > | | > | +------+ | > +----+SGP1 +---+ > +------+ > Actually, something more important than whether me,you or somebody else > thinks that it is valid is whether the protocol supports it. From SGP point > of view, conceptually it is irrelevant whether the destination is in IP > domain or in conventional SS7 domain. -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/