Re: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tolga,

Go read RFC 2719 again.

--brian

Tolga Asveren wrote:                                                                 (Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:57:38)
> > SGs, by definition in the consensus model, have SS7 interfaces.
> [TOLGA]I have a different opinion here. It is obvious that the initial/main
> purpose was to interface conventional SS7 networks -hence the "gateway" in
> the name-, but OTOH conceptually what SGP provides is just hosting
> corresponding SCCP(MTP3 for M3UA) layer for the applications on ASPs. As far
> as I can see it really doesn't matter whether TDM based links or IP
> transport is used to transfer bits and bytes.
> 
> You know that it has been agreed that the following, where SGP1 relays
> between ASP1 and ASP2 is a valid configuration:
> 
> +------+       +------+
> | ASP1 |       | ASP2 |
> +--+---+       +---+--+
>    |               |
>    |    +------+   |
>    +----+SGP1  +---+
>         +------+
> Actually, something more important than whether me,you or somebody else
> thinks that it is valid is whether the protocol supports it. From SGP point
> of view, conceptually it is irrelevant whether the destination is in IP
> domain or in conventional SS7 domain.

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.