RE: ASP Active

"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Shashank,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Prasad, Shashank S (Shashank)
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sigtran] ASP Active
>
>
> I had a question related to ASP Active message and the definition of AS:
>
> The section 3.7.1 says:
>
>    The ASP Active message is sent by an ASP to indicate to a remote M3UA
>    peer that it is ready to process signalling traffic for a particular
>    Application Server.
>
>
> And I read from the specs, that an Application Server can be a a virtual
> switch element handling all call processing for a unique range of PSTN
> trunks, identified by an SS7 SIO/DPC/OPC/CIC_range.  Another example is a
> virtual database element, handling all HLR transactions for a
> particular SS7
> DPC/OPC/SCCP_SSN combination.
>
> In this context, here is the question:
> Let's assume that we have the following stacks at the both the ends.
>
>
>          ********    IP    ********
>          *IPSP-A*          *IPSP-B*
>          ********          ********
>
>          +------+          +------+
>          |SCCP- |          |SCCP- |
>          | User |          | User |
>          +------+          +------+
>          | SCCP |          | SCCP |
>          +------+          +------+
>          | M3UA |          | M3UA |
>          +------+          +------+
>          | SCTP |          | SCTP |
>          +------+          +------+
>          |  IP  |          |  IP  |
>          +------+          +------+
>              |________________|
>
>
>
> When the IPSP-A sends an ASP Active to IPSP-B, does it mean that the SCCP
> ONLY (at Node A) is ready for receiving signaling traffic or even the
> SCCP-User/Application (at Node A) is ready for Signaling traffic.
>
> I believe that ASP Active was sent to receive the SCCP (at Node A) traffic
> from NodeB. However, there can be a scenario wherein, at the same
> time, the
> SCCP-User (at Node A) is NOT ready to send and receive traffic from NodeB.
[TOLGA]For practical purposes, I would say that ASPAC declares readines of
the application, i.e. SCCP-User in your example. OTOH, I would think from
M3UA point of view, it wouldn't matter whichever interpretation you pick but
receiving messages with no application to process them is probably not very
useful.
>
> Let me know if this interpretation is fine.
>
> shashank
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.