RE: ASP Active
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Shashank, > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On > Behalf Of Prasad, Shashank S (Shashank) > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sigtran] ASP Active > > > I had a question related to ASP Active message and the definition of AS: > > The section 3.7.1 says: > > The ASP Active message is sent by an ASP to indicate to a remote M3UA > peer that it is ready to process signalling traffic for a particular > Application Server. > > > And I read from the specs, that an Application Server can be a a virtual > switch element handling all call processing for a unique range of PSTN > trunks, identified by an SS7 SIO/DPC/OPC/CIC_range. Another example is a > virtual database element, handling all HLR transactions for a > particular SS7 > DPC/OPC/SCCP_SSN combination. > > In this context, here is the question: > Let's assume that we have the following stacks at the both the ends. > > > ******** IP ******** > *IPSP-A* *IPSP-B* > ******** ******** > > +------+ +------+ > |SCCP- | |SCCP- | > | User | | User | > +------+ +------+ > | SCCP | | SCCP | > +------+ +------+ > | M3UA | | M3UA | > +------+ +------+ > | SCTP | | SCTP | > +------+ +------+ > | IP | | IP | > +------+ +------+ > |________________| > > > > When the IPSP-A sends an ASP Active to IPSP-B, does it mean that the SCCP > ONLY (at Node A) is ready for receiving signaling traffic or even the > SCCP-User/Application (at Node A) is ready for Signaling traffic. > > I believe that ASP Active was sent to receive the SCCP (at Node A) traffic > from NodeB. However, there can be a scenario wherein, at the same > time, the > SCCP-User (at Node A) is NOT ready to send and receive traffic from NodeB. [TOLGA]For practical purposes, I would say that ASPAC declares readines of the application, i.e. SCCP-User in your example. OTOH, I would think from M3UA point of view, it wouldn't matter whichever interpretation you pick but receiving messages with no application to process them is probably not very useful. > > Let me know if this interpretation is fine. > > shashank > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran >