Re: Coordinated service outage cannot be initiated from an ASP (AS)
Ilie Glib <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, I remember the outcome of the question in my recent mail on SOR/SOG. I have also searched for SOG/SOR and DRST, ASP on IETF mail archive and been not able to find the answer to my today's question. Today the question is a little bit different. The problem is that DRST message cannot be sent from ASPs according to current text in the SUA RFC, the implementers' guide does not provide any corrections. Note 1 in section 3.4.6. does not help either. Therefore an ASP cannot answer with an DRST representing SOG in response to a SOR received from an SS7 peer, and an ASP cannot request Coordinated service outage. The latter perhaps is not so important since it is rather unlikely that all ASPs serving an AS go out of service. Regards Ilie On 1/6/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > Ilie, > > Check back in the mail archive. > This was discussed on several occasions before. > > --brian > > Ilie Glib wrote: (Fri, 06 Jan 2006 09:54:31) > > Hello Folks, > > > > SUA RFC 3868 (section 3.4.6. Destination Restricted (DRST)) > > > > allows sending of DRST from SGs only. Therefore coordinated service > > outage cannot be initiated from an ASP (AS). > > In my view use of ASPTM is not equivalent to SCCP SOR and SOG > > messages, and ASP-Inactive cannot be translated to SOR in the SG. > > > > > > Is it a fault in the RFC or was it done on purpose? > > > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > -- > > Ilie > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sigtran mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- Ilie