Re: Multiple SCTP associations
Ilie Glib <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Sergey, It is not possible to have two SCTP associations between two Signalling processes by definition, since an association connects two SCTP endpoints and a Signalling Process is characterized by its SCTP endpoint. If you use another port number, or use dynamic port numbers you get another Signalling Process. It is possible that you have the same Signalling Process using different SCTP endpoints during non-overlapping time periods, then the Signalling Process shall identify itself via ASP_ID. Tolga pointed it right, one consequence is that state machines will not work. Пока, пока Ilie On 1/10/06, Sergey Mikhailov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that multiple SCTP associations established between the same two > signaling processes are not [explicitly] prohibited. > > 1. > Is it legal for a signaling process to establish more than one SCTP > association to the same AS/SG where these multiple associations are served > by different signaling processes? > > 2. > Is it legal for a signaling process to establish more than one SCTP > association to the same signaling process at the remote side? > > (I feel that the 2nd case may be reasonable only when the remote side does > not support multi-homed SCTP endpoints.) > > > Regards, > Sergey Mikhailov. > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > -- Ilie _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran