RE: DPNSS (DUA) RFC Updates & Clarifications
"Ken A Morneault \(kmorneau\)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <542F2F9C2CDE6B40A775125727674ECA01079849@xmb-rtp-209.amer.cisco.com> |
Michael, Either is fine (modified doc or diffs). Regards, Ken ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Mentz Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sigtran] DPNSS (DUA) RFC Updates & Clarifications Hi all, I would like to propose some additional information that I have done on the DUA RFC draft document. We have found a number of areas (specifically in areas of physical maintenance and the handling of DLC failures) that are not covered and can be open to interpretation. We also have clarifications to be made wrt. DASS2 as this has subtle differences with DPNSS that the RFC also needs to be aware of. Obviously, these are the kind of scenarios where an RFC needs good guidance on the correct approach to take. Am I to assume that I can post an updated document to this list for consideration and review? just the diffs? Please advise, Thanks, Mike Mentz _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran