Re: Multiple SCTP associations
"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00de01c616b5$b869a220$150f0f0a@smikhailov> |
Tolga, some comments below. >> > >> > 1. >> > As far as I understand it, an SCTP endpoint, to say it >> strictly, may have >> > only one SCTP association; and a signaling process may use multiple >> > SCTP >> > endpoints (and hence multiple SCTP associations) for communication with >> > different signaling processes of one AS/SG. >> [TOLGA]Yes. > [TOLGA]Actually no. Each signaling process is an SCTP endpoint. You have > different SCTP associations from this endpoint to different SCTP > endpoints. [Sergey] Ok, now I'm agree. > > SCTP endpoint ==> local IP addresses, port [Sergey] I would consider an SCTP endpoint this way: SCTP endpoint ==> combination of a set of destination transport addresses and a set of source transport addresses (see SCTP endpoint definition on Page 13 of the RFC 2960). > SCTP association ==> A relationship between two SCTP endpoints [Sergey] Agree. >> [TOLGA]The protocol never intends to use multiple associations between >> two >> signaling entities. If you follow that path -for some reason-, both sides >> will need to agree on the chneges necessary to support that scenario, >> i.e. >> it won't be a solution compliant with the protocol. [Sergey] Ok. Regards, Sergey Mikhailov.