Re: Multiple SCTP associations

"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <00de01c616b5$b869a220$150f0f0a@smikhailov>
Tolga,
some comments below.

>> >
>> > 1.
>> > As far as I understand it, an SCTP endpoint, to say it
>> strictly, may have
>> > only one SCTP association; and a signaling process may use multiple 
>> > SCTP
>> > endpoints (and hence multiple SCTP associations) for communication with
>> > different signaling processes of one AS/SG.
>> [TOLGA]Yes.
> [TOLGA]Actually no. Each signaling process is an SCTP endpoint. You have
> different SCTP associations from this endpoint to different SCTP 
> endpoints.

[Sergey] Ok, now I'm agree.

>
> SCTP endpoint ==> local IP addresses, port

[Sergey] I would consider an SCTP endpoint this way:
SCTP endpoint ==> combination of a set of destination transport addresses 
and a set of source transport addresses (see SCTP endpoint definition on 
Page 13 of the RFC 2960).

> SCTP association ==> A relationship between two SCTP endpoints

[Sergey] Agree.

>> [TOLGA]The protocol never intends to use multiple associations between 
>> two
>> signaling entities. If you follow that path -for some reason-, both sides
>> will need to agree on the chneges necessary to support that scenario, 
>> i.e.
>> it won't be a solution compliant with the protocol.

[Sergey] Ok.


Regards,
Sergey Mikhailov.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.