RE: Multiple SUA SGs, sending for SSP from SGs
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, [..snip..] > > [TOLGA]Even for PC granularity RKs, it is SG which controls/creates the > > unique view of the signaling enitity to the network, so one has to have > > necessary MTP3 procedures to support that. > > > > BTW, I wouldn't call hosting MTP3 logic in SG as "a PC in MTP3 > stack in SG", > > it is just providing necessary procedures to have the unique view of the > > signaling enitity and generating corresponding network messages > -and it is > > the multiple clones of the same unique view on different SGs, > which are not > > synchronized, which may create issues for multiple-SG scenarios-. > > STPs do this all day long. [TOLGA]On the practical side of how things work, I agree with you that with multiple-SG acting as STP scenario where RKs are in PC granularity, the possibly different views of the hosted PC are less of a problem. In such a case hosting necessary MTP3 logic for AS maps pretty much to route management from functionality point of view.