Re: (M2PA) M2PA Implementor's Guide Kickoff

Jeffrey,

Perhaps you could start by formulating at least a problem statement for
each item that you think presents a problem.  It might also be an idea
to consult the authors of the RFC.

Maybe start with PO and Figure 16.  What problem is there with the text
or the example?  I don't see any problem.

Also, I don't believe that there are any outstanding problems with the
document at all.

--brian

Craig, Jeffrey wrote:                   (Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:32:17)
> Hello Brian,
> 
> > and should not be the editor's personal pet peeve list for the
> specification 
> 
> Personal pet peeves? Many of the defects I listed I obtained straight
> from
> other's posts on the SIGTRAN listserv. I posted them as a proposal to
> kickoff
> discussion.
> 
> I look forward to other's comments. If the community agrees to your
> strict 
> definition of 'defect' and that there are no M2PA 'defects', then there
> won't be
> a M2PA IG. If the only 'defect' is the processor outage text, then that
> is what
> the M2PA IG will address and nothing else.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeff

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/