Re: (M2PA) M2PA Implementor's Guide Kickoff

Craig,

I hope your descriptions are less vague than they are
in this note.  I look forward to commenting on your
draft.  Perhaps you should call it draft-craig-m2pa-ig
because it is already far from consensus.  The RFC _is_
the current consensus.

--brian

Craig, Jeffrey wrote:                                               (Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:41:49)
> Hello Brian,
> 
> Both Figures 15 and 16 are defective in that they fail
> to accurately depict the L3L2 and L2L3 primitives that
> are essential to the procedures being described.
> 
> The processor outage section is defective in that it
> fails to adequately address the aligned not ready state.
> It also fails to adequately address the ambiguity in
> treatment of received LSR based upon stream.
> 
> I am working on detailed problem descriptions and 
> proposed new text and new figures that addresses 
> my concerns. Stay tuned.
> 
> As far as you not seeing any defects in the document,
> I am not surprised, since you were an author. I think
> the RFC can better serve its audience by being clear
> to everyone, not just the authors.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeff 
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/