Re: Some very fundamental SIGTRAN question
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Barry, Good call! --brian Barry Nagelberg wrote: (Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:24:39) > Stanislav, > > 1) Your colleague is correct. xUA is a SIGnalling TRANsport (SIGTRAN) > protocol, designed to transport legacy SS7 signalling over modern > packet networks. Nothing more and nothing less. > > Your definition has several errors: > a) SGP/ASP/IPSP aren't protocols. They are network elements. > b) Not "everything inside (ASP/IPSP/SGP) is implementor's choice". > There are many "MUSTS" and "MUST NOTS" in the specs. > > 2) Your colleague is wrong. No particular layers are mandated by the > xUA spec. There are some RECOMMENDED layers, such as SCTP and Layer > Manager, but the internal implementation is not MANDATED. > > You are also wrong. The xUA protocols must be concerned with > transmission of traffic. xUA, as an SCTP-user, must supervise and > control the operation of the SCTP layer. > > 3) You are both correct. At the SGP, the AS is essentially an > addressing concept. At the ASP, the AS is essentially an application > concept. > > 4) You are both correct. At the SGP, the ASP is a transport concept > (there is a 1:1 relationship between ASP and SCTP association). At the > ASP, the concept of ASP is an instantiation of an AS. > > 5) You are both correct. xUA handles transport. At the ASP, xUA > handles granularity of Application Services - for example, how many > instantiations, or ASPs, are necessary to handle the traffic for an > Application Server. > > 6) Your colleague is wrong. The interaction between Layer Manager and > xUA is simply a recommendation. It's not a mandatory part of the spec. > > Barry Nagelberg > Adax, Inc. > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/