Re: Multiple SUA SGs, sending for SSP from SGs
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stanislav, Neither the ASP-SGP nor IPSP-IPSP models require you to use AS or RC. Define 1 AS per ASP only and give it RC value 0. Make that AS an entire point code (or network appearance for that matter). Then this RK:AS:RC 3-tuple that bothers you so much falls away. --brian Stanislav Ivanovich wrote: (Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:19:29) > > Hello, > > > > In addition to the last mail: > > > > The original idea was to have one user function at ASP connected to 2 > SGW (thus two independent SCCP/MTP layers). So in order to solve this > we said -> we need an (i.e. 1) MTP/SCCP layer at ASP place which is to > communicate with independent MTP/SCCP layers at SGW'es side. > > > > However here you again have one user function connected to one > MTP/SCCP layer. This is exactly what the Tolga's SGP-SGP solution > covers. The only difference is that ASP-SGP and IPSP-IPSP protocols do > mandate use of AS concepts with all the restrictions which imply from > these protocols... which we do not have in SGP-SGP protocol. > > > > So again we have very fundamental question -> what does AS/RC concept > provide us with on the interface between two MTP/SCCP relay equipped > processes? > > > > It brings us just restrictions and problems nothing else! > > > > / stanislav > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/