Re: Regarding IUA - TEI Query Request message in RFC 4233
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hmmm,
from
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sigtran-adapt
Management (MGMT) Message (0)
Value Description Reference
----- --------------------------------------- ---------
0 Error (ERR)
[RFC3057],[RFC3331],[RFC3332],
[RFC3868],
[draft-ietf-sigtran-dua-07.txt],
[RFC3807]
1 Notify (NTFY)
[RFC3057],[RFC3331],[RFC3332],
[RFC3868],
[draft-ietf-sigtran-dua-07.txt],
[RFC3807]
2 TEI Status Request [RFC3057],[RFC3807]
3 TEI Status Confirm [RFC3057],[RFC3807]
4 TEI Status Indication [RFC3057],[RFC3807]
5 DLC Status Request
[draft-ietf-sigtran-dua-07.txt]
6 DLC Status Confirm
[draft-ietf-sigtran-dua-07.txt]
7 DLC Status Indication
[draft-ietf-sigtran-dua-07.txt]
Is it possible that IANA missed the assignment for the TEI query
request? Was
there an IANA considerations section in the ID? (I have to admitt that
I never looked
at the ID).
Best regards
Michael
On Jan 16, 2006, at 13:57 Uhr, Ravi Kanojia wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While going through latest IUA RFC (RFC 4233), we observed that a new
> management message “TEI query request” added.
> Management messages for IUA (RFC 4233) and DUA have an overlap i.e.
> the same message number has been used twice
>
> Message Group 0 & Message Type 5
> IUA - TEI query request, and
> DUA - DLC status request.
>
> What will be the possible resolution of this issue?
>
> Best Regards,
> Ravi Kanojia
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran