Re: IUA: error conditions
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Saraswati, Saraswati Bose wrote: (Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:59:34) > > Hi Brian, > > > > 1. Should we encode error message as " protocol error" in response to > QOTM message received with IUA message header fields missing like DLCI > etc? Or can we discard the message simply? > Sure. Another option is to drop the link or abort the association, because the peer has violated a requirement. > > > 2. Should SG encode error message "protocol error" against > DATA/UNITDATA INDICATION message received from ASP?Or can we discard > the message simply? > Come now... Read "Unexpected Message" under RFC 3057 Section 3.3.3.1. > > > 3. Should ASP encode error message " protocol error" against > DATA/UNITDATA REQ message received from SG?Or can we discard the > message simply? > Again, read "Unexpected Message" under RFC 3057 Section 3.3.3.1. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/