RE: Is an xxUA SGP capable of serving multiple SGs
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, Good point. "1 SG supporting multiple networks" is an equally valid way to express the idea. I nevertheless contend that "multiple SGs in an SGP" is a valid concept. I find it an easy way to conceptualize the setup that I described below, sort of a mirror image of "multiple ASs in an ASP". Barry Nagelberg Adax, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 9:30 AM To: Barry Nagelberg Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Is an xxUA SGP capable of serving multiple SGs Barry, I would call that 1 SG supporting multiple networks, not an SGP belonging to multiple SGs. --brian Barry Nagelberg wrote: (Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:24:47) > Tolga, > > There is no need for the "SGP to inform ASP about which SGs that specific SGP is part of". This is known to the craft > administrator at each end, SGP and ASP. > > Let's consider the example in which a single SGP is serving 2 SGs. SG1 represents SS7 network 1 and SG2 represents > network 2. > The ASP wishes to register to receive data only for network 1, i.e. SG1. The craft administrators agree that a value of > '1' in the Network Appearance param will represent network 1. > > 1. When the ASP sends a REG_REQ msg, it includes the Network Appearance param, and sets it to '1'. This tells the SGP > that the ASP wishes to register to receive data for network 1, i.e. SG1. > > 2. The SGP approves the registration request and responds with Routing Context 1. Now the ASP and SGP have established > that all communications between them for network 1 will be indicated by routing context 1. > > Barry Nagelberg > Adax, Inc. > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/