Re: Is an xxUA SGP capable of serving multiple SGs
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Siu,
An SG is defined as "containing" an SGP. Therefore, the relation
you describe does not make sense. For example, SG2 cannot be both
"contained by" SG1 as well as "contained by" SG2.
--brian
Siu Chai Tho wrote: (Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:21:24)
>
> Hello SIGTRAN Community!
>
>
>
> Let me reformulate my initial question.
>
>
>
> I am after the following case. Imagine two overlapping sets of SGPs
>
> S1 = {SGP1, SGP2, SGP3},
>
> S2 = {SGP2, SGP3, SGP4},
>
> and let's assume set S1 is serving SG1, while set S2 is serving SG2.
>
>
>
> Is this situation possible?
>
>
>
> I think it would have impacts both on SG as well as ASP
> implementations.
>
> Is it so?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Joe
>
>
--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/