Re: SG view of the ASP

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ilie,

It is also in RFC 3331:

   Note: The ASP Identifier MUST be used where the SGP cannot
         identify the ASP by pre-configured address/port number
         information (e.g., where an ASP is resident on a Host using
         dynamic address/port number assignment).

Also, the following statement is in all three (including rfc3057bis):

      ASP Identifier Required                0xe
      Invalid ASP Identifier                 0xf

   The "ASP Identifier Required" is sent by a SGP in response to an
   ASPUP message which does not contain an ASP Identifier parameter when
   the SGP requires one.  The ASP SHOULD resend the ASPUP message with
   an ASP Identifier.

   The "Invalid ASP Identifier" is sent by a SGP in response to an ASPUP
   message with an invalid (i.e. non-unique) ASP Identifier.

--brian

Ilie Glib wrote:                              (Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:43:29)
> Hello All,
> 
> SUA RFC has the following note. It looks OK to me, and it explains one
> of the reasons for ASP-IDs.
> 
>    Note 1:    ASP Identifier MUST be used where the IPSP/SGP cannot
>               identify the ASP by provisioned address/port number
>               information (e.g., where an ASP is resident on a Host
>               using dynamic address/port number assignment).
> 
> The other reason is NTFY.
> 
> The spec shall cover both
> 
> Regards
> 
> Ilie
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.