Re: SG view of the ASP
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilie,
It is also in RFC 3331:
Note: The ASP Identifier MUST be used where the SGP cannot
identify the ASP by pre-configured address/port number
information (e.g., where an ASP is resident on a Host using
dynamic address/port number assignment).
Also, the following statement is in all three (including rfc3057bis):
ASP Identifier Required 0xe
Invalid ASP Identifier 0xf
The "ASP Identifier Required" is sent by a SGP in response to an
ASPUP message which does not contain an ASP Identifier parameter when
the SGP requires one. The ASP SHOULD resend the ASPUP message with
an ASP Identifier.
The "Invalid ASP Identifier" is sent by a SGP in response to an ASPUP
message with an invalid (i.e. non-unique) ASP Identifier.
--brian
Ilie Glib wrote: (Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:43:29)
> Hello All,
>
> SUA RFC has the following note. It looks OK to me, and it explains one
> of the reasons for ASP-IDs.
>
> Note 1: ASP Identifier MUST be used where the IPSP/SGP cannot
> identify the ASP by provisioned address/port number
> information (e.g., where an ASP is resident on a Host
> using dynamic address/port number assignment).
>
> The other reason is NTFY.
>
> The spec shall cover both
>
> Regards
>
> Ilie
>
--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/