RE: Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP
"Trentadue, Tim" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You are correct. The test I refer to comes from draft-anshoo-test-spec-m3ua-01.txt When reading the statement "the remote ASP state is changed to ASP-INACTIVE in all relevant Application Servers", should I interperet from the perspective of the SGP? i.e., "the remote ASP state (at the SGP) is changed to ASP-INACTIVE in all relevant Application Servers (at the SGP)" ?? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tolga Asveren Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Sigtran] Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP Tim, I don't know which document this test case is from but I assume it is one of the drafts prepared for interoperability testings(?), so I believe it is a safer approach to refer to RFC/IG rather than to such drafts. 4.3.4.1 from M3UA IG If an ASP Up message is received and internally the remote ASP is in the ASP-ACTIVE state, an ASP Up Ack message is returned, as well as, an Error message ("Unexpected Message). In addition, the remote ASP state is changed to ASP-INACTIVE in all relevant Application Servers and all registered Routing Keys are considered deregistered. The above is the current officially expected behavior. Note for IG update: Figure 3 misses this transition. Thanks, Tolga > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On > Behalf Of Trentadue, Tim > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sigtran] Test 4.4 when testing M3UA at SGP > > > The PURPOSE and TEST DESCRIPTION.3 of this test seem to contradict > each other and I'm hoping somebody can clarify. > > PURPOSE states "and ASP state is moved to ASP-Inactive" - I assume > this is from the perspective of SGP > > DESCRIPTION.3 states "State of ASP should not change to ASP Inactive" > - I assume this too is from the perspective of the SGP. If so, it > contradicts the PURPOSE, right? > > > > > + TEST NUMBER : 4.4 > > + TITLE : Invalid Message Handling > > + SUBTITLE : ASPUP message in ASP-Active state > > + PURPOSE: To check that if ASPUP message is received in > ASP-Active > state then ACK message is sent to AS and ASP > state is moved to ASP-Inactive. > > + TEST CONFIGURATION: A > > + PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SCTP association is established between > SGP and > ASP and ASP1 is Active. Arrange the data in AS such that ASPUP > message is sent to the SGP on stream 0. > > EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE : > ASP SGP SM + NIF > ASP is Active > > ASPUP ----------------> > > <--------------- ASP-Up-Ack > > Status Ind -------> AS > Inactive > > <--------------- Error > (Unexpected Message) > > ASPAC ----------------> > Status Ind -------> > > <--------------- ASP-Active-Ack > > TEST DESCRIPTION: > 1. Send ASPUP message to the SGP in ASP-Active state. > 2. Check A: An Error message with parameter Unexpected Message > should > be received at ASP. > 3. Check B: State of ASP should not change to ASP Inactive. > Send ASPAC > message with correct Type (Type is same as defined at SGP > for the > AS) and routing context P to the SGP and SGP should send > ASP-Active-Ack. > > Tim Trentadue > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran