RE: SUA: Relay: SG-SG
"May, Howard" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <39CC97884CA19A4D8D6296FE94357BCB047C1AC0@swsmsx404> |
Brian, Ilie, Allow me to modify my request in light of your previous comments: I would value seeing example message flows for the following: 1) IPSP to Relay communication 2) Relay to Relay communication Regards Howard >-----Original Message----- >From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: 20 February 2006 10:05 >To: May, Howard >Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SUA: Relay: SG-SG > >Howard, > >May, Howard wrote: (Mon, 20 Feb 2006 >09:36:42) >> Hi Brian, Ilie >> >> Consider the following simple system: >> >> AS1(PC10)/ASP1 connecting to SGP1. >> AS2(PC20)/ASP2 connected to SGP2. >> SGP1 and SGP2 both contain the relay function and connect to >each other. >> >> Assume the following initial state: >> >> ASP1/ASP2 UP and AS1/AS2 ACTIVE. >> SGP1/SGP2 association down. >> >> My question is: >> >> Once the association between SGP1 and SGP2 is established >what message >> flow would be expected. > >Some more questions: > >Do SGP1 and SGP2 belong to the same SG? Different SG? > >If different SG, why do you have an association between >SGP1(SG1) and SGP2(SG2)? By definition, SGs are connected to >the SS7 network and therefore technically can signal each other >over the SS7 network. > >If you want to rule out the SS7 network in your example, make >them IPSPs instead of SGs (i.e., take away the SG function). In >which case the ASPs are really more appropriately described as >SE IPSPs without the relay or SG function. > >--brian > >> >> To put it another way; I would find it very helpful to see >some example >> message flows for SG-SG relay functionality. >> >> Regards >> >> Howard >> > >-- >Brian F. G. Bidulock >[email protected] >http://www.openss7.org/ >