Re: Gap between rfc2719 and M2UA

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:18:54 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization	http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

?????,

????? ?????????? wrote:                                                              (Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:14:38)
> 
> 
> 
>  I don't have much interest in proprietary solutions because they denied use
>  of different vendors equipment in the network.
> 
>  So M2UA is not good for SGs interoperation, but can I do it with M3UA
>  (SS7->SG->M3UA->SG->SS7)?

Or M2PA (SS7->SG->M2PA->SG->SS7).  In either case, however, the SG needs an MTP3
unlike Case 2 in the Framwork RFC.

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/