RE: M3UA notify message

"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Brian,

Please show where in the specification it says that ASPTM/ASPSM relationship
is between ASP and SG?

   Thanks,
   Tolga

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:50 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
>    (Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:28:21)
> > Barry,
> >
> > Let me retry to explain my position:
> >
> > Coordination of AS/ASP is necessary to create the unique SPMC view. This
> > does not mean that the coordinated state should be used for
> M3UA procedures
> > on each SGP. Each SGP should maintain its own staet machine from ASP/SGP
> > procedures point of view.
> >
>
> Your statements conflict with the consensus that went into
> the RFC as upheld by the mailing list discussion on the matter.
>
> --brian
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.