Re: M3UA notify message
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Tolga Asveren wrote: (Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:14:41) > Brian, > > State sharing/State coordination etc.. are all not well defined terms. What > I mean is that each SGP needs to execute ASPTM/ASPSM state machine > procedures independently. One SGP cannot execute an override independent of the other SGPs (that is, without considering which is the current primary ASP for the AS as determined considering the ASP state in each SGP). This is one reason why ASP state is mentioned in 1.4.1. If you mean to say that ASP state is maintained at the SGP for each and every ASP to which the SGP has an association, then that is true; however, this does not mean that the SGP can perform state machine procedures without consideration for the state of the ASPs in other SGPs for the same AS. Therefore, although the ASP state is maintained in this fashion, the SGP needs to _not_ "execute ASPTM/ASPSM state machine procedures independently". --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/