RE: M3UA notify message
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:52 PM > To: Tolga Asveren > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message > > > Tolga, > > Tolga Asveren wrote: > (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:59:14) > > --x--snip--x-- > > > > > There are not contradicting statements. > > [TOLGA]Let me try to summarize what I find as weak explanation in the > > specification: > > >From the passage I quoted before: > > The SGP > > or IPSP then MUST send a Notify message ("Alternate ASP_Active") to > > the previously active ASP in the AS, and SHOULD stop traffic to/from > > that ASP. > > > > I would expect here "SG SHOULD stop traffic to/from that ASP" > not "The SGP". > > Similar not-so-clear statements are all over 4.3 > > > > An SG does not route traffic: and SG is a logical grouping of SGP. > SGP(s) route traffic. [TOLGA]To be constructive, let me suggest this: "SGPs which are part of the same SG" BTW, do you have any opinion on why not all ASPTM is not using the global-AS view, e.g. why an ASP should send ASPAC to all SGPs? > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ >