RE: M3UA notify message

Brian,

I don't know whether it is realistic to expect that _cost_ for messages
coming from two SGPs belonging to the same SG are different -whatever that
_cost_ is-

For now let me assume _cost_ is different for messages coming from SGP1 and
SGP2. We already had ASP1 and now let's introduce ASP2 to the picture. Let
me use the following symbols:

_cost_11 : Cost between SGP1, ASP1  = 1
_cost_12 : Cost between SGP1, ASP2  = 5
_cost_21 : Cost betweeen SGP2, ASP1 = 5
_cost_22 : Cost between SGP2, ASP2 = 1

Now, being the _cost_ efficient operator we are, we want mainly to use the
paths ASP1-SGP1 and ASP2-SGP2 but want to have the paths ASP1-SGP2 and
ASP2-SGP1 as backup. How can we achieve this?

   Tolga



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:40 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> Implementation specific.  You want an example?  How about _cost_?
>
> --brian
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
>    (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:14:41)
> > Brian,
> >
> > No, I am serious. What is the difference between a message
> coming from SGP1
> > and SGP2 for the same AS from ASP point of view? Are they processed
> > differently? Are messages from SGP1 higher priority/more
> valuable/more dear
> > to the ASP?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:18 PM
> > > To: Tolga Asveren
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA notify message
> > >
> > >
> > > Tolga,
> > >
> > > Tolga Asveren wrote:
> > >    (Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:32:59)
> > > > >
> > > > > Because (except in the case of override) ASPAC starts traffic
> > > between an
> > > > > ASP and an SGP on a specific association.  Do you not believe
> > > that it is
> > > > > a good thing to be able to control traffic on an association?
> > > > [TOLGA]Let me play the devil's advocate: Why should it be?
> Didn't ASP
> > > > already indicated its interest for this traffic range with the first
> > > > ASPAC/ASPAC-ACK exchange? Why should it matter from ASP
> point of view,
> > > > whether this traffic is coming from SGP1 or SGP2?
> > >
> > > Don't be silly.
> > >
> > > --brian
> > >
> > > --
> > > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.openss7.org/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>