Re: M3UA notify message
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, The cost between SGP1 and SGP2 can be the highest. (Hint: It is the most important link in the system.) --brian Tolga Asveren wrote: (Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:21:30) > Brian, > > If the message flow you quoted is the one you are mentioning, I don't think > it will be an efficient solution. > > All traffic will be received by the ASP sending ASPAC last (ASP2). All SS7 > traffic received by SGP1 would be internally routed to SGP2. This itself is > not a nice thing in any situation from performance point of view but in the > scenario we are considering, it would be even less desirable, because if we > consider the _cost_ parameters, it wouldn't be unrealistic to expect that > _cost_ between SGP1 and SGP2 is high (it was low between SGP1/ASP1 , > SGP2/ASP2 but high between SGP1/ASP2 , SGP1/ASP2. Furthermore, only ASP2 > would receive traffic , leaving ASP1 resources idle. > > Tolga > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/