Re: IP aliases and SCTP network paths question
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, see my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Mar 3, 2006, at 21:48 Uhr, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Mark, > > I use the destination address contained in the heartbeat info > and ignore the source address for the BEAT ACK for most purposes. > However, difficulties might ensue if the source address is not > one that corresponds to at least some destination address in the > association for the peer receiving the BEAT ACK. Then it is an out of the blue packet... An ABORT might be sent. > > --brian > > Michael Tuexen wrote: (Fri, 03 Mar 2006 20:25:04) >> Hi Mark, >> >> I would consider the received HEARTBEAT-ACK as one for the path on >> which the HEARTBEAT was >> sent to... >> >> Best regards >> Michael >> >> On Mar 3, 2006, at 16:18 Uhr, Davidson, Mark wrote: >> >>> When using an IP address alias on an interface, depending on the >>> implementation, a heartbeat ack may be sent with an IP "from" address >>> different than the one to which the heartbeat was sent (i.e. if the >>> IP >>> layer is allowed to fill in the "from" address). Should the receiver >>> of the heartbeat ack treat a heartbeat ack with correct payload but >>> unexpected "from" address as valid? >>> >>> -Mark_______________________________________________ >>> Sigtran mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sigtran mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ >