Re: SUA Address Indicator

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Warren,

Do you know of a case where bit 8 has a national assignment that is
actually in use?

--brian

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Warren Anthony Briggs wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Could you please clarify the following:
> 
> Q.713. section 3.4.1   states that bit 8 of the SCCP Address Indicator 
> parameter is reserved for national use.   RFC 3868 appears to indicate 
> that this bit is spare and always 0.  Am I interpreting this correctly 
> or should this bit have a 1 to 1 mapping  when encoding from SUA to SCCP 
> and vice versa?
> 
> thank you,
> warren briggs.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock    ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
[email protected]    ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in  ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying  to adapt the  world  to himself. ¦
                        ¦ Therefore  all  progress  depends on the ¦
                        ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.