Re: (M2PA) Initial version of M2PA IG is Now Available
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark, Davidson, Mark wrote: (Fri, 26 May 2006 09:22:50) > The waiting occurs after the LSPR is sent (an LSR has not yet been > sent). > I.e., the LPO side waits for the first LSR, but the RPO side does not > need to wait for the second one. The change you refer to affected > the RPO side. The wait I'm referring to is on the LPO side. Just as the side exiting LPO must wait for a FISU or MSU in ANSI T1.113.3-2000 Clause 8 (Q.703 has little to say on the matter). M2PA just uses LSR in this case instead of a FISU or MSU. I take it back: "receive" in the passage you quoted can stay at "receive". No change required. > > If Q.703 is followed closely the link will not align. I think that's > a problem. It doesn't appear that all those Q.703 implementations out there have any problem aligning. So you don't think that M2PA should correct Q.703 SDLs? --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/