Re: SCTP: Heartbeat ack recieved without sending Heartbeat
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Comments in-line, Best regards Michael On Jun 16, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > ash, > > See also RFC 4460 Section 2.36. That section describes initial path verification. I think his question was more general: How do you process a received HB-ACK, when you have never sent a HB? The other point I made was: Even if you sent a HB, you can not be sure that the peer reflects the HB info. It could be an attacker... (we did this years ago at an interop and this provided some implementations problems...) > > --brian > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran >