Re: M3UA, Routing Context parameter in SSNM
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
±è, ±è ¹«Çü wrote: (Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:17:46) > but, there is single Routing Key and Routing Context between ASP and > SGP. > > In RFC 3332, > Routing Context is not required. Where multiple Routing Keys and > Routing Contexts are used across a common association, the Routing > Context(s) MUST be sent to identify the concerned traffic flows > for which the DUNA message applies, assisting in outgoing traffic > management and internal distribution of MTP-PAUSE indications to > MTP3-Users at the receiver. > > if there is single Routing Key and Routing Context between the SGP > and ASP as our configuration, > is the Routing Context parameter in SSNM message optional? or mandatory? Optional: because there are not "multiple Routing Keys and Routing Contexts used accross a common association" and, therefore, the MUST does not apply. As there is only one routing context for the entire association, the implementation should not have a problem discerning that. OTOH, an implementation could choose to send one anyway (if one was even assigned). --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/