Re: SUA: Message distribution among Load Shared ASPs (IPSPcase)
"Saurabh Jain" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brian & Lincoln, Thanks for your comments. I was trying to access the discussions related to 1. SUA-09: SCCP Connections and TCAP Transactions from Jan 2002. 2. Coupling of SUA connections 3. SUA incapability of providing seamless or transparent interworking for protocol classes 2 and 3 dating back to 2001. However, I was able to locate archives only till "Aug 01 2002" on the following web page. "http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran/current/mail256.html" Are the discussions dated before Aug 01 2002 available on net, if yes, how can they be accessed? rgds Saurabh On 6/30/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > Haresign, > > Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Thu, 29 > Jun 2006 15:25:46) > > Brian, > > > > I would be happy to review your documents if/when they are distributed > > throught the IETF as drafts (I think I said this about six months or so > > ago). In the interim, since TID routing is the only existing approved > > solution, there's certainly no reason why people can't use/adopt it. > > That last version of the drafts were published on the IETF servers in > October > 2005 and did not expire until May (just last month). As six months was > obviously not sufficient time for you to review the drafts, they will > appear > again for six months. These drafts, in more or less their current form > have > been available on the IETF servers on and off for 4 revisions (2 years > each). > If you wait another 7 months to look at them on the IETF servers, they > will > expire again. > > > > > There are a couple reason that immediately come to mind why SLS is not a > > good mechanism. The first is fact that SLS can change in an ANSI > > network. For example, if point code A is connected to point code B via > > LINKSET F (direct F linkset) as well as LINKSET A1 and A2 (combined > > linkset to a pair of STPs). > > LOADSEL supports more than SLS (SI, CIC, TID, DLR, Address Range, and an > unlimited set of pre-arranged load selections). Read the draft. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran