Re: [SCTP] Minimum DATA Length possible
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran,gmane.ietf.tsvwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I'm sending the answer also to TSVWG, where the SCTP related things are discussed now... draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis-02 should be changed to state A DATA chunk with a user data field of length L will have Length set to (16 + L) (indicating 16+L bytes). I consider this editorial. Best regards Michael On Jul 19, 2006, at 12:35 PM, ash kat wrote: > Hi All > > What is the minimum possible length of user DATA which can be sent > by SCTP DATA chunk? > > ------------------------------ > 1. As per Section 3.3.1 of > draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis-02 > ------------------------------ > " Length: 16 bits (unsigned integer) > This field indicates the length of the DATA chunk in bytes from > the beginning of the type field to the end of the user data > field > excluding any padding. A DATA chunk with no user data field > will > have Length set to 16 (indicating 16 bytes)." > > This indicate that user data of length zero can be sent by setting > "length" field in the DATA chunk to 16, which is the DATA chunk > header length. It means no user data in the DATA chunk. > > However as per > ------------------------------ > Section 3.3.10.9 of > draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis-02 > ------------------------------ > > " 3.3.10.9. No User Data (9) > Cause of error > --------------- > No User Data: This error cause is returned to the originator of a > DATA chunk if a received DATA chunk has no user data. " > > So my point is that - > If the length field in the DATA chunk Header will be of 16 bytes > then there will be no user data in the DATA chunk and when there > will be no user data in the DATA chunk the SCTP will returm error. > So why it is allowed by SCTP to send DATA chunk with no user data > when it is not accepted by the peer SCTP. > > Thanks & Regards, > --Ashwani Kathuria > FSS India > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran