RE: Sigtran Digest, Vol 29, Issue 2
"Ambika Pr. Tripathy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi All,
My impression on below setting is, ASP and one SG reside in the same
device since one ASP end association contains IP2 as an alternative path
which is used for the second association as the destination address.
If i am not wrong, the association configuration at ASP end must match,
since the same association will communicate to SG 2.
Br
Ambika P. Tripathy
>-- Original Message --
>From: [email protected]
>Subject: Sigtran Digest, Vol 29, Issue 2
>To: [email protected]
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:00:22 -0400
>
>
>Send Sigtran mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Sigtran digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. SCTP: Multihoming Configuration (Saraswati Bose)
> 2. Re: SCTP: Multihoming Configuration (Brian F. G. Bidulock)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 22:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Saraswati Bose <[email protected]>
>Subject: [Sigtran] SCTP: Multihoming Configuration
>To: Brian Bidulock <[email protected]>, sigtran <[email protected]>
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hi Brian,
> please suggest in the below.
>
> Endpoint A (ASP) Endpoint B (SG)
> ASSO-1
> IPs== IP1,IP2 IP== IP1'
> Port==P1 Port== P1'
>
> ASSO-2
> IPs== IP1 IP== IP2
> Port==P1 Port== P2
>
> In ASP side Is the above a valid configuration?
> If yes then wht about the fact tht the same transport address of one
multi
>homed endpoint (IP1+P1) must be used by any other SCTP endpoint?
>
> If no then how to support 1 ASP 2 SG scenario since we need 2 unique
ASSOCIATION
>establishment for the scenarion?
>
> Regards,
> Saraswati
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small
>Business.
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sigtran/attachments/20060905/478167ee/attachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 03:55:20 -0600
>From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
>Subject: [Sigtran] Re: SCTP: Multihoming Configuration
>To: Saraswati Bose <[email protected]>
>Cc: sigtran <[email protected]>
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Saraswati,
>
>Saraswati Bose wrote: (Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:23:07)
>>
>> In ASP side Is the above a valid configuration?
>
>Yes, it is valid but not common.
>
>> If yes then wht about the fact tht the same transport address of
one
>> multi homed endpoint (IP1+P1) must be used by any other SCTP endpoint?
>
>The only rule is that there can only be one associated between a pair of
>transport addresses (address list and port number). The rule is not violoated
>here because in the second instance IP1,P1 connects to IP2,P2.
>
>--brian
>
>--
>Brian F. G. Bidulock
>[email protected]
>http://www.openss7.org/
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
>End of Sigtran Digest, Vol 29, Issue 2
>**************************************
Ambika Prasad Tripathy
NetHawk Networks India Pvt. Ltd.
Charampa, Bhadrak, Orissa
India-756101
mob: +91-94373 07049
mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
web: www.nethawk.fi