Re: SCTP data message handling
"Ashish Soregaonkar" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>From RFC2960 Section 6.1
A) At any given time, the data sender MUST NOT transmit new data to
any destination transport address if its peer's rwnd indicates
that the peer has no buffer space (i.e. rwnd is 0, see Section
6.2.1). However, regardless of the value of rwnd (including if it
is 0), the data sender can always have one DATA chunk in flight to
the receiver if allowed by cwnd (see rule B below). This rule
allows the sender to probe for a change in rwnd that the sender
missed due to the SACK having been lost in transit from the data
receiver to the data sender.
HTH,
Ashish
On 9/14/06, Saraswati Bose <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
> please suggest in the below
> SCTP-A SCTP-B
> ARWND==4000 No fragmentation/bundling
> to be done
>
> ASSOCIATION ESTABLISHED..
>
>
> <-----------User Data of size 5000 bytes
> ?? Should endpoint B simply reject the data or send it to peer and peer
> shound reject the data?
>
> Regards,
> Saraswati
>
> ------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42297/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran