Re: Re: ASP Active for pending RC

Bhanu Prakash <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
<>Padmalochan,

The ASP state will not change to ACTIVE untill the ASP ACTIVE ACK
has been received for the corresponding RCs.

Regards,
Bhanu.

Padmalochan Moharana wrote:

>Hi brian,
>
>suppose the ASP active contains 5 RCs. But SG responce
>Active ack with 3 RC .Also not receive error for the
>rest of the 2 RC then should ASP encode ASP Active for
>the rest of the 2 RC.
>
>
>
>--- "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Padmalochan,
>>
>>Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:            (Fri, 15 Sep
>>2006 00:11:54)
>>    
>>
>>>Padmalochan,
>>>
>>>Padmalochan Moharana wrote:          (Thu, 14 Sep
>>>      
>>>
>>2006 22:20:52)
>>    
>>
>>>>Hi Brian,
>>>>
>>>>please suggest for the following doubts.
>>>>
>>>>1 - In SUA should ASP encode ASP Active for
>>>>        
>>>>
>>pending
>>    
>>
>>>>RCs if no responce is being received for them.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I am not sure what you mean by "pending RCs".
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>2 - Should the state of the ASP change to ACTIVE
>>>>        
>>>>
>>if it
>>    
>>
>>>>not received ASP ACTIVE ACK  for all the RC
>>>>        
>>>>
>>encoded in
>>    
>>
>>>>the ASP ACTIVE message.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>The state can change to AS-ACTIVE for the AS for
>>>      
>>>
>>which
>>    
>>
>>>ASP ACTIVE ACK was received for the associated
>>>      
>>>
>>RCs.  The
>>    
>>
>>>state of AS for which no ASP ACTIVE ACK has been
>>>      
>>>
>>received
>>    
>>
>>>for the corresponding RCs, can remanin in a state
>>>      
>>>
>>awaiting
>>    
>>
>>>receipt of an ASP ACTIVE ACK.  If a timeout
>>>      
>>>
>>occurs, the
>>    
>>
>>>ASP can resend ASP ACTIVE with the RC for which no
>>>      
>>>
>>responding
>>    
>>
>>>ASP ACITVE ACK has yet been received.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Let me put that another way:  Sending multiple RCs
>>in an ASP ACTIVE
>>(Ack) or ASP INACTIVE (Ack) is really just a
>>convenience for compacting
>>multiple messages into one.  No relationship between
>>the RCs contained
>>in the message is formed by placing them together. 
>>From a state machine
>>view, one message containing five different RC
>>values is treated the
>>same as though 5 messages of the same type were
>>received each with only
>>one RC value in it.
>>
>>--brian
>>
>>-- 
>>Brian F. G. Bidulock
>>[email protected]
>>http://www.openss7.org/
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.