Re: Traffiic Mode : Help Please
Ramma <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brain, Thank you very much for replying. I am struck in a situation where I have a node (My node) which is configured as an AS and have the limitation that it can have only one ASP serving this AS and the traffic mode is always override. There is no way to configure the localAS traffic mode but you can set up the traffic mode for the remote AS. Using this node I want to talk to a peer node which have 2 ASPs and these 2 ASPs have to work in loadshare mode. Any hence I have the configuration as mentioned in my previous mail. My questions would be 1. Is there anything "illegal" with respect to the standards regarding this configuration. I cant find anything in the RFC which forbids this. 2. Is it mandory that if I am working in a particular traffic mode (say loadshare), my peer should work in the same traffic mode ? With respect to question number 2, if I have a situation where I am an AS with 2 ASPs working in loadshare mode and I am talking to 2 different AS -- one of which is working in loadshare mode and the other one in override. Cant I do that ??? Thank you very much for your time and I really appreciate your help. Regards Ramma On 9/21/06, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ramma, > > Ramma wrote: (Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:29:04) > > I have tried to configure as above with my local node having one > ASP > > and I have configured myself to work in override mode but I am > talking > > to an AS which is working in loadshare mode. > > There is nothing in the spec requiring an implementation to > support such an arrangement. It doesn't even sound useful > to me. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- Make God Laugh, Tell Him Your Future Plans _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran