RE: SUA implementor's guide

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

Lode has the pen at the moment, but if people can read and comment on
the
current draft, maybe we can see if there is consensus enough to close
off
the remaining issues and then go for WGLC.

John 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: 29 September, 2006 18:52
>To: Ong, Lyndon; Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>
>I'm interested....there were a number of 
>improvements/clarifications in the implementors guide.  If 
>there's anything I can do to help keep this up or move it 
>along to RFC, let me know.
>
>Regards,
>Lincoln 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ong, Lyndon [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:46 AM
>To: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>
>Hi Guys,
>
>I suspect that Loede and John have been too busy to keep this updated.
>Is there still interest in this?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Lyndon 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Barry Nagelberg [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:30 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>
>Lincoln,
>
>It has apparently expired and been deleted. It was issued on March 6.
>
><snip>
>Signalling Transport Working group                             
> L. Coene
>Internet-Draft                                                 
>  Siemens
>Expires: September 7, 2006                                   
>J. Loughney
>                                                               
>    Nokia
>                                                           
>March 6, 2006
>
>
>                        SUA Implementor's guide
>           <draft-ietf-sigtran-sua-implementor-guide-03.txt>
><snip>
>
>Barry Nagelberg
>Adax, Inc.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:16 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>
>
>
>Just out of curiosity, what happened to the SUA implementer's guide? 
>
>Was there any intention to update the SUA RFC in a similar 
>manner as was done to the M3UA RFC? 
>
>Regards,
>Lincoln 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sigtran mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.