Affected SPC is a mandatory parameter in SUA SCON
"Ilie Glib" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Folks, On the one hand, according to SUA RFC, an IPSP MAY indicate local congestion to an SUA peer with an SCON message. On the other hand, Affected SPC is a mandatory parameter in SCON. Therefore, in case the IPSP serves a hostname or IP address, and does not serve an SPC, the IPSP has to use a dummy SPC, which shall be interpreted as an indication that own nodal congestion is experienced in the IPSP originating the SCON message. To avoid use of dummy SPCs in SCONs, it would be good to change the SUA RFC, and make the Affected SPC an optional parameter in SCON exchanged by IPSPs. I believe RC parameter is sufficient in SCON, and Affected SPC can be made optional in that case. This is because DPC is not mandatory in the RK definition of IPSPs. Perhaps, the same could apply to M3UA, if DPC was optional in the RK definition. Any opinions? Thank you in advance -- Ilie