RE: SUA implementor's guide

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
You can't do WGLC on an expired Internet Draft, however if you resubmit
it, then
we could.

John 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Coene, Lode [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: 02 October, 2006 12:46
>To: Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki); 
>[email protected]; [email protected]; 
>[email protected]; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>
>Hello all,
>
>WE can already do the WGLC on this version and include any 
>comment during last call in the updated version.
>That would speed up this a little bit...
>As far as I know, there are no remaing issues .. But a WGLC 
>has the canning ability to bring issues back to the front... 
>
>Lyndon, Is it possible to do a WG last call on this version.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>Lode
>
>Siemens COM
>atealaan 34          2200 Herentals, Belgium
>E-mail: [email protected]
>Tel: +32-14-252081
>Fax: +32-14-253212
>
> 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: vrijdag 29 september 2006 18:20
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Lode has the pen at the moment, but if people can read and 
>comment on 
>> the current draft, maybe we can see if there is consensus enough to 
>> close off the remaining issues and then go for WGLC.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: ext Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >Sent: 29 September, 2006 18:52
>> >To: Ong, Lyndon; Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
>> >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>> >
>> >I'm interested....there were a number of 
>improvements/clarifications 
>> >in the implementors guide.  If there's anything I can do to 
>help keep 
>> >this up or move it along to RFC, let me know.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Lincoln
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Ong, Lyndon [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:46 AM
>> >To: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
>> >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>> >
>> >Hi Guys,
>> >
>> >I suspect that Loede and John have been too busy to keep
>> this updated.
>> >Is there still interest in this?
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >
>> >Lyndon
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Barry Nagelberg [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:30 AM
>> >To: [email protected]
>> >Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>> >
>> >Lincoln,
>> >
>> >It has apparently expired and been deleted. It was issued 
>on March 6.
>> >
>> ><snip>
>> >Signalling Transport Working group                             
>> > L. Coene
>> >Internet-Draft                                                 
>> >  Siemens
>> >Expires: September 7, 2006                                   
>> >J. Loughney
>> >                                                               
>> >    Nokia
>> >                                                           
>> >March 6, 2006
>> >
>> >
>> >                        SUA Implementor's guide
>> >           <draft-ietf-sigtran-sua-implementor-guide-03.txt>
>> ><snip>
>> >
>> >Barry Nagelberg
>> >Adax, Inc.
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Haresign Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:16 AM
>> >To: [email protected]
>> >Subject: [Sigtran] SUA implementor's guide
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Just out of curiosity, what happened to the SUA 
>implementer's guide? 
>> >
>> >Was there any intention to update the SUA RFC in a similar 
>manner as 
>> >was done to the M3UA RFC?
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Lincoln
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Sigtran mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Sigtran mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Sigtran mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Sigtran mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>> >
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sigtran mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.