RE: M2PA Alignment Clarification

"Newman, Catherine J" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <A09345776B6C7A4985573569C0F3004311EC3F25@rrc-dte-exs01.dte.telcordia.com>
Brian,

I'm not sure I understand your suggestion...
There is no indication to M2PA of remote SCTP acknowledgment, and no
M2PA acknowledgement for LSSUs (even T7 does not apply). 

Per the M2PA RFC section 4.1.3, "it is RECOMMENDED that the
Proving_Interval be set so that the traffic load generated with the Link
Status Proving messages during the proving period is comparable to the
normal traffic load expected when the link is in service."  Therefore,
it doesn't seem that this is meant to be a timeout.

Going back to the original issue, the far end had recently sent LSPN (or
LSPE) followed by an LSR on stream 0. Since it received an LSR from the
near end, it also sent an SLTM on stream 1. The SCTP protocol doesn't
guarantee ordering between streams, thus the proving messages (last few
LSPN/LSPE and LSR) and SLTM can be received in the reverse order from
what was sent - I don't see why this should be considered an error. The
comparable scenario doesn't exist in MTP2 (on which the M2PA RFC
alignment/proving procedures are based) since there are 2 streams in
M2PA which creates additional race conditions that don't exist in MTP2.
The M2PA RFC should explicitly address this scenario.

Thanks,
Cathy Newman

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Erickson, Mark
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M2PA Alignment Clarification

Mark,

Just wait until all your proving messages (or the LSR) have
been acknowleged by the peer SCTP before sending DATA.

Otherwise, choose your Proving_Interval more wisely.

--brian

Erickson, Mark wrote:                     (Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:12:37)
> Brian:
> 
> So, a stream synchronization error was created during alignment due to
> normal, real-life network conditions.  How should the link recover -
> that was my original question?  Force the link down and attempt to
> re-establish the link?
> 
> Is there a better method?  What about acknowledging the proving
messages
> in some fashion?
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.