Re: TID and DRN Label Issues - Issue #1

Lincoln,

>    ...                              If more than one ASP is in the ASP-
>    ACTIVE state (i.e., traffic is to be load-shared across more than one
>    ASP), one of the ASPs in the ASP_ACTIVE state is selected from the
>    list.  ...

There is no mention of applying DRN/TID label in the selection if DRN/TID
labels are in effect.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                                           (Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:04:06)
> Brian,
> 
> I guess I don't see the conflict.
> 
> Lincoln 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3:38 PM
> To: Haresign Lincoln
> Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
> Subject: TID and DRN Label Issues - Issue #1
> 
> Lincoln,
> 
> RFC 3868 says:
> 
> 4.1.1.  Receipt of Primitives from SCCP
> 
>    The SUA message distribution function determines the Application
>    Server (AS) based on comparing the information in the N-UNITDATA
>    request primitive with a provisioned Routing Key.
> 
>    From the list of ASPs within the AS table, an ASP in the ASP-ACTIVE
>    state is selected and a DATA message is constructed and issued on the
>    corresponding SCTP association.  If more than one ASP is in the ASP-
>    ACTIVE state (i.e., traffic is to be load-shared across more than one
>    ASP), one of the ASPs in the ASP_ACTIVE state is selected from the
>    list.  ...
> 
> This statement is in conflict with the use of TID and DRN label.
> 
> --brian
> 
> 
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/