RE: Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2

Brian,

I didn't say MUST, I said SHOULD.  You can change that to MAY.

Regards,
Lincoln 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:44 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2

Lincoln,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                                           (Wed,
11 Oct 2006 16:36:06)
> Brian,
> 
> OK, then we can put something in the IG.
> 
> With regards to "towards the SS7 network", there are plenty of places 
> in the RFC that say what an SG should do towards the SS7 network.  
> Perhaps I'm not understanding your point.
> 

There are no other places in the RFC that say what the implementation
must do towards the SS7 network.  I assure you, I removed them all in
last call.  There is mention of what the SG MAY do, but not what it must
except in the case of DRN/TID label (which didn't really go through a
last call).

If you see any place in the RFC that says what an SG must do toward the
SS7 network, please point it out, because it needs to go in the IG too.

--brian


--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/