RE: Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2

Brian,

You can change that to MAY.

Lincoln 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:51 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2

Lincoln,

No you can't say what an SG SHOULD do toward the SS7 network either.
Please point out any of those.

--brian


Haresign Lincoln wrote:                                           (Wed,
11 Oct 2006 16:46:53)
> Brian,
> 
> I didn't say MUST, I said SHOULD.  You can change that to MAY.
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:44 PM
> To: Haresign Lincoln
> Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN Label Issues - Issue #2
> 
> Lincoln,
> 
> Haresign Lincoln wrote:
(Wed,
> 11 Oct 2006 16:36:06)
> > Brian,
> > 
> > OK, then we can put something in the IG.
> > 
> > With regards to "towards the SS7 network", there are plenty of 
> > places in the RFC that say what an SG should do towards the SS7
network.
> > Perhaps I'm not understanding your point.
> > 
> 
> There are no other places in the RFC that say what the implementation 
> must do towards the SS7 network.  I assure you, I removed them all in 
> last call.  There is mention of what the SG MAY do, but not what it 
> must except in the case of DRN/TID label (which didn't really go 
> through a last call).
> 
> If you see any place in the RFC that says what an SG must do toward 
> the
> SS7 network, please point it out, because it needs to go in the IG
too.
> 
> --brian
> 
> 
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/