RE: Re: DRN and TID Label Issues

"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB04E8BDB3@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com>
Brian,

I think better wording might be:

  The TID label mechanism might not work in certain types of application
such
  as when there are two linked dialogues and the second one is initated
by 
  the network.  In this particular case, the SG may not know how to
route the 
  new dialog back to the correct ASP that was handling the first dialog.

Personally, I think this issue is solvable, although not trivial.  But I
think saying that it MUST NOT be used eliminates the possibility that a
vendor can solve it.  Why eliminate the possibility for innovation.  If
you point out to the users the dangers, I would have to assume that they
can understand that and take it in to consideration.

Regards,
Lincoln

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:15 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues

Lincoln,

Then we must strike TID for linked dialogs.  Words to the effect:

  The TID Label mechanism MUST NOT be used where linked dialogues
  are involved.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                   (Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:12:06)
> Brian,
> 
> If you are referring to our proprietary mechansim for routing linked 
> dialog back to the correct ASP, I don't believe it is relevant.  It is

> an implementation unique feature that we have designed to handle this 
> scenario and not relevant to this discussion.
> 
> I agree with you that TID routing will not solve linked dialogs.  
> There are many problems that the SUA spec does not explicity solve.  
> That leaves room for companies to be innovative.
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:01 PM
> To: Haresign Lincoln
> Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues
> 
> Haresign,
> 
> Your proprietary ones.
> 
> --brian
> 
> Haresign Lincoln wrote:
(Wed,
> 11 Oct 2006 16:54:00)
> > Brian,
> > 
> > Sorry, but I lost the thread.  I'm not sure what solutions you are 
> > referring to here.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Lincoln
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:48 PM
> > To: Haresign Lincoln
> > Cc: Barry Nagelberg; [email protected]
> > Subject: [Sigtran] Re: DRN and TID Label Issues
> > 
> > Lincoln,
> > 
> > Then please contribute your solutions.
> > 
> > --brian
> > 
> > --
> > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.openss7.org/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> 
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.