Re: RFC 2960 : #14. Suggested SCTP Protocol Parameter Values

Michael Tuexen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Robby,

these values are given for the usage of SCTP as a general transport  
protocol
in the public Internet. You most likely want to use different values  
when you use
SCTP for SIGTRAN in a private network. That is why the ETSI spec for  
SCTP requires
SCTP implementations to provide a set of configurable parameters  
requires values
from the  minimum, maximum and granulary. From an interoperability  
point if view
the delayed SACK timer and the RTO values of the peer are related.

In addition to the SCTP layer you need to adjust the SCTP parameters  
to the parameters
in the upper layer, like M2PA for example. But this is not an SCTP  
issue...

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 17, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Robby Pocornie wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> In RFC 2960, October 2000 the Retransmission timers are difined in  
> chapter 14 as:
>
> Suggested SCTP Protocol Parameter Values
>    The following protocol parameters are RECOMMENDED:
>    RTO.Initial              - 3  seconds
>    RTO.Min                   - 1  second
>    RTO.Max                 -  60 seconds
> ........etc..
> My question is: are these values not ridiculously too large for  
> today Signalling enviroment.
> Is RTO.Min of 1 second not too large. I think 120 msec / 200 msec  
> would be enough.
>
> Can you tell me if someone also has occur poblems with interworking  
> where one Vender has 1000 msec and the other 200msec
> and how do I can solve those problems.
>
> Within ITU specs you find Bileteral agreements for this kind of  
> issue's. In IETF RFC I still not find this kind of agreement
> mention
>
> Regards,
> Robby Pocornie
> [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.