Re: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jitin, There are no procedures for CIC in RFC 3332 either: just the parameter, leading to non-interoperable implementations. Although one can conceive of fashions in which to use it, there are many non-interoperable interpretations of how that could be done. I figured that either we should describe an interoperable solution or remove it. The WG decided to remove it and address it in an extension draft. draft-bidulock-sigtran-loadsel-04.txt is such an extension draft that describes an interoperable solution and is a good starting point for providing this functionality and has been avialable for years. It seems that implementors have preferred to provide their own proprietary solutions rather than advancing and contributing to a common standard solution. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/