RE: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB051C020A@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, So in the case that we loose completely connectivity to an AS, what would the SG do? Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:38 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message Lincoln, Well, I usually assign ISUP routing keys based on OPC/DPC pairings. That way the CIC is significant, otherwise is certainly would not be. Note that OPC/DPC pairings still meets the TS 102 142 requirement. --brian Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:26:03) > Brian, > > "did you look at the spec" > > Yes. > > You say AS is on the basis of PC. Do you mean OPC? Or DPC? > > Again, the way I understand this is that each AS must have a routing > criteria based upon either OPC or DPC and then you can use LOADSEL for > loadsharing the CIC ranges within the AS. Is that correct, or have I > misunderstood? > > Regards, > Lincoln > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/