RE: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message

"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB051C020A@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com>
Brian,

So in the case that we loose completely connectivity to an AS, what
would the SG do?  

Regards,
Lincoln

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:38 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message

Lincoln,

Well, I usually assign ISUP routing keys based on OPC/DPC pairings.
That way the CIC is significant, otherwise is certainly would not be.
Note that OPC/DPC pairings still meets the TS 102 142 requirement.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                      (Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:26:03)
> Brian,
> 
> "did you look at the spec" 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> You say AS is on the basis of PC.  Do you mean OPC?  Or DPC?  
> 
> Again, the way I understand this is that each AS must have a routing 
> criteria based upon either OPC or DPC and then you can use LOADSEL for

> loadsharing the CIC ranges within the AS.  Is that correct, or have I 
> misunderstood?
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.