Re: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ilie, Ilie Glib wrote: (Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:41:04) > > I think that CIC ranges belong more to load distribution mechanism > rather than to an RK. > That is precisely what the WG agreed upon when CIC was removed from the routing key in the M3UA IG -03. What didn't happen (although it was supposed to be addressed in an "extension draft") was adoption of a load distribution mechanism similar to LOADSEL or LOADGRP to provide a usable replacement mechanism supporting dynamic registration. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/